Wednesday, March 18, 2009
the society that tyrannizes over me is very intolerant when I question the notion of 'equality'. they falsely claim to be humans, and this for no other reason than using the notion of equality to outcast and manipulate me. when the tyranny of the majority is used to justify doing to me everything society tells me is wrong, it's funny that I always have to be the one justifying myself to them, as they have a monopoly over the truth. I often write very long lists of the things being done to me, which are very serious things, but I am to expect no mercy and no understanding from anyone. if I try to fight for my rights, they have plenty of ways prepared to thwart that.
if this was a society based on equality and anything close to what it's claimed to be, they'd be able to say: well this is just some guy with an opinion that we don't like, but since there are so very many of us and only one of him, the chances of any one of us ever running into him even once nevermind more than once are very small, and we don't know what he looks like anyways, so it's not a big deal. but when everywhere I go, every member of the population goes out of its way to suppress my perspective, my right to have a perspective, and my right to use my eyes or my ears, this is already not a society that's based on equality, and any criticism they make in this direction is irrelevant.
Thursday, March 12, 2009
often some boid will declare that it is more than a boid and demand to be treated as equal. what’s expected is for me to overlook that they actually seem to have more rights than I do, and that they seem to be there for absolutely no other reason than taking freedom away from me. if a bunch of identical, replicated, simulated people without emotions or suffering wanted to take credit for not being such, it might not bother me so much if I didn’t know they were doing it for no other reason than exploiting me in any way they can.
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Thursday, March 5, 2009
many things can be questioned about rights, but those who are the system have no entitlement to do so. whenever some boid is given such title as 'professor' or 'psychiatrist', and then uses its authority to question my rights, it always so happens that its ulterior motives are well visible, and its legitimacy refuted.
would it be considered a form of censorship if one finds it very difficult to enter any website, look at anything, talk to anyone, or listen to anyone, due to intentional psychological abuse constantly inflicted by the entire collective by any and all means, while no one listens to you, and you often get attacked by a mob when you express an idea? also helpful is using a facade of 'capitalism' to justify what is actually totalitarianism.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)